Learning from REDD+: a response to Fletcher et al.

Learning from REDD+: a response to Fletcher et al.

Arild Angelsen, ∗ Maria Brockhaus, Amy E. Duchelle, Anne Larson, Christopher Martius, William D. Sunderlin, Louis Verchot, Grace Wong, and Sven Wunder School of Economics and Business, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5033, N-1432, Ås, Norway Department of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, Latokartanonkaari 7, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland Center for International Forestry R...

Public Participation: Methods Matter; A Response to Boaz et al.

Debating REDD+ and its implications: reply to Angelsen et al.

Robert Fletcher, ∗ Wolfram Dressler, Bram Büscher, and Zachary R. Anderson Sociology of Development and Change, Wageningen University, De Leeuwenborch, Hollandseweg 1, 6707 KN, Wageningen, Netherlands School of Geography, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia Department of Geography and Planning, University of Toronto, 100 St. George Street, Room 5047, Toronto, ON M55 3G3,...

Response to comment from Brasky et al.

We thank Brasky et al. for their review (Brasky et al., 2016) of our meta-analysis on the association between NSAID use and risk of endometrial cancer (Verdoodt et al., 2016). We welcome the additional information on two of their studies, and the discussion points they have raised, which are valuable contributions to the topics discussed in our meta-analysis. Below we respond to the issues rais...

Response to Sadek et al. and Kotlikoff et al.

Ditte Caroline Andersen,1,2,* Charlotte Harken Jensen,1 and Søren Paludan Sheikh1,3 1Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense C, Denmark 2Clinical Institute/University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense C, Denmark 3Institute of Molecular Medicine/University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense C, Den...